16ª JORNADAS DEL GRUPO IBÉRICO DE ARACNOLOGÍA

     
 

Are Eresidae more threaten than average? Using machine learning to tackle knowledge bias in Red Listing

 
 

 

 
 

Sergio Henriques1,2

 
     
 

1Indicators & Assesments Unit (Institute of Zoology). UK.

 
 

2Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research (University College Londo). UK.

 
 

 

 
 

Eresus are considered one of the rarest spiders in Europe, despite occurring in some of the best studied countries in the world, and the conspicuous coloration of wandering males; which considerably reduces under-sampling. The main concern is that rare is often considered to be a synonym of endangered, but there are seven recognized types of rarity, and not all of them are equally correlated with extinction vulnerability. In order to truly assess extinction risk, most experts regognize the metrics of the IUCN Red List criteria. However, Red List assessments are costly, time consuming and logistically complex. With currents extinction rates, many species may even become extinct before we are able to assess them. Time is therefore of the essence, a pragmatic approach that speeds up the assessment process and provides general trends of extinction across a wider range of taxonomic groups is an urgent endeavour. The Sampled Red List Index has been proposed as a solution to many of these issues. However despite being a sampled approach our knowledge is still skewed towards better-known groups, often with reduced species diversity. I will discuss how machine learning can help us address these issues, and how we can begin to answer specific conservation questions, such as: Which spider families are more threaten?.